please empty your brain below

Gotta loved joined up public services.
One day they'll come together as an Agile team of stakeholders to get this sort of thing done without fuss.
You pre-empted my knee-jerk rant about a cyclist still using the pavement instead of the cycle lane!
Also gotta love the coded language of the reply from TfL. Being 'keen to work' with 'our borough partners' amused me as well, DG!
I guess having a popular blog comes in handy from time to time.
I found that joined up public services were more joined up before the Utilities got privatised and the local authorities had not outsourced many of their functions.

Also the track record of TfL in liaising with Boroughs when introducing cycleways is far from exemplary. I speak from the almost risible experience of the implementation of CSH2.

MO
There is normally a preferred direction for a public transport shelter to face to protect people from prevailing wind and rain. The shelter has been turned around 180 degrees. Strange and I wonder which is the correct direction.
Well spotted!

But TfL's Accessible Bus Stop Design Guidance says nothing about prevailing wind direction. Instead the choice of whether to use a 'Centre of path layout', 'Back of path layout' or 'Back to kerb layout' is generally dependent on pavement width.

In this case the pavement has been significantly widened during the junction improvement works, allowing a change in optimum orientation.
So with local knowledge of weather, which direction is correct? I'd hate to thing the latter is wrong.

dg writes: Neither "is correct".










TridentScan | Privacy Policy