please empty your brain below

The underground in Brussels has an excellent system. On a diagram of the line, moving points of light show where the approaching trains are.

Matthew Somerville's app,
http://traintimes.org.uk/map/tube/
takes its information from TfL, who could obviously offer the same system as Brussels if they wished to.

Matthew notes that 'some H&C and Circle stations are missing from the TfL feed'. These would be Goldhawk Road - Royal Oak where you (DG) note that there are no Next Train Indicators.
You wonder why updating the train indicators is linked to the re-signalling, after all TfL says that wifi is now available at tube stations, so why not fit next train indicators that just take their information from the same source as the mobile phone apps do?
Edgware Rd used to have the most gloriously eccentric way of presenting an overview of the 4 arrivals DMI on each platform.

At the bottom of the staircase was a display showing info from all 4 platforms. This was achieved by means of 4 video cameras, trained on each of the platform departure boards, combined and live-streamed to a TV!

dg writes: It's still there, and still in use.
What technology does TfL use for its "next bus indicators" at bus stops?
Now that dg has called out the Upton park light box, how long till the tfl diamondgeezer blog followers replace it!
Which app would you open to find out?
I sometimes wait for H & C at Barking and as you say, they spring it on you.
(My other gripe is District Line trains at Upminster - I find out which platform so late that by the time I get the lift down, or even the stairs, it's gone and I have to go up again - which is getting harder as I get older - I know I could see at least when one is coming, but have forgotten which app does it).
Surely the H&C line does service Liverpool St & Kings Cross along with the Met line?
I never use the H&C line, but it's the impression given by the maps!

Talking of lightboxes, Harrow on the Hill has them. Pretty, but utterly useless, other than to tell you which of the two platforms the train will arrive at!
Congratulations on finding a new 'cause'! I used to work at a school near Bow Road, and found the lack of information very irritating when trying to choose when going to somewhere like Liverpool Street, where I could wait for the direct train, or change at Mile End ...... bearing in mind the overload of information offered in some locations, this was very frustrating.

I imagine that it must be really difficult for tourists if they ever get this far up the line. I often 'do my good deed for the day', explaining the intricacies of the inner 'cut and cover' services!
Stratford Eastbound Central Line's one indicator is out of service; and at the other end of the platform the only indicator, where the Central's one should be, informs you the next train is for Shenfield, etc. I have seen many people perplexed by this, especially non-Londoners.
All these pale into comparison to the Jubilee line at stratford where the worlds tiniest, least illuminated board, which isn't even pointing towards the stairs announces which platform the next train will depart from
Err, it's not precisely a new cause. DG has done next train indicators before. But each time he does it he says something new. I am impressed by the work that has gone into this survey.

I wonder if the indicators, being linked directly in to the signalling, however ropey, give more accurate information than the apps at times of disruption. Anecdotally, I suspect they don't, from what I have seen and heard. But they might. Difficult to check because you never know when disruption is going to happen.

It's all down to money and managers-who-can-get-details-right. I suspect both are in short supply.
@cornishcockney

The H&c and Met do both serve Liverpool Street and Kings Cross, but this light box is at Upton Park, which has not seen a Metropolitan Line train for a quarter of a century.

But if you want quirky information displays, my local station is capable of displaying the same train on three platforms at once, and also of telling you that a train of is expected to arrive 45 minutes ago - that is to say, at is shown as running 15 minutes late, when its scheduled time is already an hour in the past.
Indeed, when I said that DG had done next train indicators before, I grossly underspoke. A search in the box on his site, courtesy of "Do no harm" gives about 90 hits. Some of these do not relate to the underground (indeed one refers to Kempston Hardwick), and a few of them are tangential mentions-in-passing. But the poor state of LU's indicators is one bone which is not going to escape DG's dogged teeth any time soon.
Andrew,
whatever tech they use for the busses, I hope they're not rolling it out anywhere else. Sure, 90% of the time it seems to work alright, but the other 10% of the time it takes a bus 15 minutes to go from "1 minute" to "due" to vanishing off the display without ever being seen.
I love the old lightboxes for their heritage value (the one at Earls Court in particular) but they're really not fit for purpose in a modern age. I think we see here the consequences of the tube's early adoption of a lot of technology.

Still it's nothing compared to what I saw in Ireland some seven years ago. There the indicator boards were stuck on the timetable. The published timetable. Not even updated for planned engineering work. And when everything went belly up at Cork, with trains late or cancelled, no indication there was anything wrong at all!

So it's not all bad!
DG, can I steal "Hotchpotch of Legacy Systems" for my band name, if I ever a) learn to play an instrument and b) start a band?
Why are the lightboxes not fit for purpose? They tell you where the next train is going - indeed some of them could tell you where the next three trains were going. The only other thing you really need to know is how long you will have to wait if no train is shown - and that can be done with a permament notice.

Actually, all the indicators have the "feature" of telling you where the next three trains are going, even if they are all going to the same place. What you really need to know is where the next train to each possible destination is.
timbo - if they were all we had, everywhere, light boxes would be fine.

But they don't match the capabilities now expected of them. No idea when the next train is coming, where trains 2 and 3 are going to appear etc. No ability to report information about delays. They were a solution from a different age.

I live in the burbs of the North now, and even my local railway station with its two trains an hour has a display that can tell me far more than a lightbox.
timbo - the lightbox at Upton Park is not fit for purpose because it doesn't tell you where the next train is going, it gets it wrong.

By the same token, the digital eastbound Next Train Indicator at Bow Road is also not fit for purpose.
The red DMI at Edgware Road was actually installed later than the Type 1 to see if it improved visibility.
But it's not the fact that the equipment is a lightbox that makes it not fit for purpose, it's the system driving it.

There is a station on my line which gives you information up to 119 minutes ahead (239 minutes on Sundays), despite there being only one possible destination, and which platform the train will go from is obvious as there is only one. Another station on the same line can give you as little as three minutes' warning despite having 19 platforms and dozens of possible destinations.
As a young trainee in the early 1980s I was at St James's Park the night the first experimental Dot Matrix Indicators were installed. Competing firms installed their systems on the 2 platforms, and spent half the night trading insults across the tracks on their respective displays.

In some cases (eg Gt Portland St EB) the short notice is simply because the system cannot be sure which train will arrive first until it has crossed a junction. In other cases I suspect the interface between the train tracking system and the DMIs is distinctly flakey. The south side of the Circle line seems particularly unreliable, with St James's Park ironically often getting it totally wrong even as the train arrives.
One problem for eastbound indicators is at Great Portland Street and Euston Square: they are in the wake of the Baker Street junction.

Where two (or more!) routes converge before the station, 'the system' cannot tell which train is next until the points are locked for that route and the train is on the relevant track circuit (not sure about the second bit - repeating what I was told from my Underground days), then the indicators take a feed from the relevant 'programming machine' (this too may be out of date).

Doesn't explain all the other irregularities, but may give an understanding why you wait also at Aldgate East for a next train indication too...
From what I've been told the bus indicators, for frequent services at least, use GPS position and then use the time taken by the last three services between the bus current location and the stop to estimate how long it will take to arrive- so roughly account for traffic.
@ Andrew / Al_S - yep that's pretty much right for how I-Bus tracks the bus location. There used to be a nice project page on the TfL website that explained how it worked but the ever tidy TfL have removed it.

In certain places where a stop is close to a starting point the system displays the scheduled time until the bus is started up and then moves. This is why you get buses merrily counting down minute by minute and then the final 1 minute lasts for however long it takes the driver to actually start driving the bus. I see this all the time in Ilford where a lot of buses start from Hainault St stand. I've also been badly caught out where a bus is shown, via a phone app, as due in 2 mins but it actually whizzes up the road. Again a problem of a mismatch between the scheduled time being displayed and the bus being driven at rocket speed out of Turnpike Lane bus stn and zapping through the traffic lights. A not nice 20 minute wait then resulted!

I-Bus / Countdown is pretty decent but it has its foibles and it's not easy to work out how to resolve them given "real life" out on the roads throws up so many variables that can cause delays.
At some stations - and especially on National Rail lines, the replacement of Type 1 or equivalent style indicators by Type 4 style may have the advantage of showing more trains but there is a huge disadvantage...

Many people need to be much closer to them to read them. This is important when services can switch platforms.

Our local South West Trains station has the newer set on one platform and the older style on another. I can read the old ones from the platform with the new ones even when I'm too far from the new indicator to be able to read it on the platform I'm using.

I've also noticed that the two sets of indicators display the train information differently. In fact the new ones show less information about the first train than the old ones. You have to wait for a longer to see it all. Very odd.
@RayL

Hayes & Harlimgton had such displays - similar to those used by the signal staff themselves - when I used to use the station, 15 years ago. Probably replaced by something less informative now.
The (relatively) new information boards at various Thameslink stations are a great improvement over the old yellow dot matrix ones.
The Upton Park lightbox: I wonder if it'd be possible to just replace the frontplate with one with up-to-date text on it. Still doesn't solve the problem of not distinguishing between District line termini (and the bigger problem of being wrong most of the time).
Further to Joel's comment Paddington (Circle and District) is another example of waiting until the train has passed the Junction, before the system knows which train is coming first. The junction here being Praed St Junction. The problem on main line stations is that the system knows where a train is, knows how long it should take to get to the station, but if two trains are coming On different routes the system does not know which one will come first, and is not driven by the signalling system.
Can we sort out the westbound indicators at Liverpool Street. Off peak Met Line trains are all advertised as all stations to Finchley Road, Preston Road then all stations! So they all seem to skip Wembley Park... Apart from one being unreadable.

The line diagram on the bridge still shows H&C to Barking as peak only too despite the re-tiling.
Battery operated Countdown screen trial.
Check the photo...

http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/tfl-trialling-new-battery-operated-countdown-screens/
Wonder how long the batteries last. And whether they could be re-charged with a solar panel.

TfL were trialling an e-ink bus stop display as well recently.
just after I read this I discovered that 'Train Describers' are the subject of the next London Underground Railway Society meeting on Nov 8th

http://www.lurs.org.uk/meetings.htm

perhaps DG should go along and heckle?

“Train Describers,” by Ross Deacon BSc (Hons) MBA CEng FIRSE MIET Principal Engineer - Signalling, Capital Programmes Directorate, London Underground.

Mr Deacon will discuss the development of Train Describer Systems from the early years through to the more modern passenger information systems that we have today.

Non Members may attend (if I recall correctly), but you may want to check with the Society first if you plan to go.
Stepney Green eastbound is a lightbox too
Goldhawk Road now has indicators though (of course) they're not showing any data: https://twitter.com/Stephen_Neal/status/821735229815746560/










TridentScan | Privacy Policy