please empty your brain below

Interesting that Reading has an increase, perhaps the station rebuilding has made train travel more attractive. I expect Reading will rise up the charts when Crossrail arrives there.
"we perhaps ought to question the service"
That's Diamond Beeching, that is.
Glasgow Queen Street (High Level) was closed for 4 months of the sample period for track and electrification work. Some services were diverted to the low level station, but most were curtailed and replaced by buses or diverted to Glasgow Central so that probably accounts for its drop in numbers.

On a more pedantic note, is Angel Road closing and a new station opening nearby, or is the replacement technically the same station?

dg writes: Updated, thanks.
Belmont may soon be moving out of the 'ten least busy National Rail stations' since a 'Cancer Hub' (big research facility) and a secondary school are planned for the old Sutton Hospital site.
With the Tramlink route to Sutton now secured as a planning policy, there is also talk of restoring double track to Belmont, either for trains or to use one track for trams to the Cancer Hub/school.
@ Waterhouse, perhaps you do DG a discredit? Perhaps rather than taking after the Doctor, he is suggesting that with a better service some of these might have healthy use?
Separating TfL and non-TfL stations is difficult, as at many stations Overground and/or Underground share the same barrier line with other services and I think the stats cover them all (Indeed, three of the top ten non-z1 London stations are actually operated by London Underground)

The first five of your "London's ten busiest "non-TfL" stations outside zone 1" includes three on the Overground (albeit not the main flow), and three on the Underground - and if they qualify surely Stratford and Romford (whose figures lie between Putney's and Balham's) do too?

dg writes: My list excludes stations managed by TfL, so no Stratford or Romford.

Ten stations (non z1) with no LO, TfL Rail, or LU service:
East Croydon, Lewisham (the DLR station has a separate barrier line), Surbiton, Putney, Balham, Bromley South, Earlsfield, Sutton, Twickenham, Kingston
I had no idea Liverpool had more than one major station, and that Lime Street wasn’t its busiest station.
Also worth noting that Clapham Junction’s main service provision was from South West Trains. Their usage figures have declined by more than Southern’s so Clapham Junction’s decrease in numbers may be a double whammy.
As an answer to the least used list's volatility, what stations have been on the top ten/twenty list for the most years running?

dg writes: Over the last ten years, Barry Links and Tees-Side Airport have been in the top 10 every year, Coombe Junction and Reddish South nine times, Buckenham eight times and Breich seven.
@anon 0852
Liverpool Central is the interchange between the two Merseyrail lines. It only has three platforms, all of them under ground.
@None which leads me to believe Liverpool Central is somewhat "cheating" its way since it is essentially a tube station.
"dg writes: My list excludes stations managed by TfL, so no Stratford or Romford."

Interesting, however both these stations are owned by Network Rail so you could choose either way. But your site, so your rules, fair enough.
Curiously, the admirable Geofftech has Epsom Downs "creeping in to the bottom 10" of London stations at No 7.

Epsom Downs is in Surrey. If it had been included as part of "London" last year it would have been No 6.

Maybe his definition of "London" has changed to include all stations on Oyster. (The station has been in Oysterland since 2006)
The UK's ten busiest National Rail stations that aren't in London (2015/16)

Wot, a year earlier than the other tables?

dg writes: Fixed, thanks.
@Barbara

that's because i sorted mine by stations in Zones 1-6, and based it on that. Epsom Downs (in Z6) though is indeed actually outside of the Greater London Boundary... my bad.
I am somewhat struck by the anachronism of having of the "Top Ten Bottom Stations" ...
I've mentioned it before -
The eastern end of the Goblin route would get a boost if were to be connected to the Central Line at Leytonstone High Road > Leytonstone, similarly to Hackney Downs > Hackney Central.
Plenty of scope for new passengers on The Loughton > Woodford > Barking axis.
Sadly, the station that came closest to the mean number for Cornwall is no longer Par.
Thanks for this but I'm not clear what the numbers mean. Is there someone at Barry Links counting the number of passengers? Or is it based on tickets to and from that station. If it's the latter, usage could be much higher.

I see that there's a Methodology and Validation Report but it's heavy going, so I'm hoping someone can provide a quick answer.

dg writes: Can you bear to watch a video?
When you have all those people moaning about the money spent on rail in London, its worth looking at how many suburban London stations have passengers figures higher than ones serving major towns/cities.

Salisbury (2,075,866) has fewer entries and exits than Abbey Wood (2,988,802), Bexleyheath (3,070,198), Blackheath (3,468,992), Catford Bridge (2,549,568), Chadwell Heath (3,883,758), Crystal Palace (3,646,690), Eltham (2,387,308), Feltham (4,314,704), Grove Park (2,607,402), Hayes & Harlington (3,844,544), Hither Green (3,371,600), Kingston (5,440,164), New Eltham (2,231,694), New Malden (2,981,406), Norbiton (2,334,570), Orpington (5,155,016), Petts Wood (2,273,484), Purley (3,029,276), Putney (8,867,818), Raynes Park (4,432,044), Southall (2,683,640), Streatham (2,707,566), Streatham Common (4,077,140), Streatham Hill (2,233,836), Surbiton (9,376,696), Teddington (2,234,070), Thornton Heath (3,390,804), Tottenham Hale (7,939,000), Twickenham (5,924,016), Wandsworth Town (4,087,026), Welling (2,667,122), West Hampstead Thmslnk (3,690,190), Woolwich Arsenal (3,647,666), Worcester Park (2,366,392)

I've left off nearly all the Overground stations as many are higher anyway, as well as most of the TfL ones out of Liverpool Street and ones already mentioned in the top ten for the same reason.
Salisbury has a population of about 45000 souls. It would not normally be considered a major English city these days, though it does have a glorious cathedral.
#oldmenbickeringabouttrains
@Malcolm

There are stations in larger cities with similar stats to Salisbury's. Try Plymouth, for example.

Ten of those London suburban stations have more passengers than both of Portsmouth's stations combined - and their stats presumably include passengers travelling to and from the Isle of Wight.
Perhaps I've missed something, but why are Canada Water and Whitechapel classified under "London's ten busiest National Rail stations that aren't central London termini (2016/17)"? They don't have any National Rail services - or does the new Crossrail service count?
In today's paper there is an article about Barry Links becoming the new least visited station.

However, it apparently doesn't deserve this accolade as you can't buy tickets there. Brian Boyd, an independent councillor on Angus council, said that people buy them at Carnoustie, one stop down the line. He personally assures us that at least a dozen passengers get off each and every tea-time train, the only one of the day.

dg writes: Geoff and Vicki's video from August suggests otherwise.

However, the timetable says the train calls at 19:13 for the two mile journey to Carnoustie. In the reverse direction to Dundee it stops at 6:08. I'll have to watch the video to check on the veracity of Cllr Boyd's claim.
@ Anon 7.48 2/12 - the London Overground services are all part of the National Rail network. Therefore Whitechapel and Canada Water most certainly *do* have NR services. Crossrail will also be a NR service so you will start to see Tottenham Court Road and Bond Street emerging in the statistics for 2018/19. We will also see considerable increases at other locations. The impact on Farringdon's numbers with both enhanced Thameslink and new Crossrail services will be fascinating to watch.
One thing the stats do show is how important rail is in London and why it gets a large slice of the investment funding. We have the demand and the likely prospective demand so it's no great shock that improving rail in London & SE ticks the "business case" box.

None of that is to decry the legitimate needs of towns and cities in the rest of the UK before people get testy! They just start from a lower base than London in many instances.
The list enforces the old adage of "lies, damned lies and statistics".
Canada Water is quite properly an underground station, and it is only a reclassification of the old underground Shoreditch line extension that now makes it a "NR station". The significant statistic for users takes no consideration of the passengers who interchange rather than starting/ending their journey in the daylight up top.
Mixing stations including interchange figures, and start/finish journeys does not show a true representation. My guess is that 40%+ at Canada Water are interchangers only.
"we perhaps ought to question the service they're receiving"

Chicken and egg - why did they have such a poor service (one a day, or even one a week........) in the first place, even when, as in most cases, there is a train service passing through? In most cases, these "least used" stations are in sparsely populated areas, or there is a nearby station on another line with a better service. It costs money, in fuel and wear and tear, for a train to call at a station, and adds to the journey time for everyone else. If no-one is using the station anyway, why stop there?
If they got better services, they'd be more-used. Obvs.
The stats for East Croydon are probably skewed because of Oyster / Contactless passengers touching out and touching back in again immediately.

This 'split ticketing' brings the cost of Gatwick - London Bridge down from £14.70 (peak) to £10.50, and from £8.30 (off peak) to £6.50.










TridentScan | Privacy Policy