please empty your brain below

Considering the ongoing plan to devolve power to the regions, it might be the case that London holds on to more of the money raised in taxes.

Did the drop in bus passengers coincide with the withdrawal of cash fares?, or perhaps the introduction of Uber?, extension of the Overground?
"Little to be annoyed by....."


....unless you live south of the river, as the difference between National Rail and TfL fares has increased again. What are we paying extra for? Apparently, the privilege of seeing your train whizzing through your station without stopping because it is more important to keep time than to pick up passengers. Never happens on the Underground.
Truly a tale of two cities.
Just as a comparison. A monthly all-zone Ile-de-France pass (which is a big area, including all possible commuting areas of Paris and beyond) costs €70 per month. And just to add value, employers have to pay half that. An annual pass is €770 - so, €385 to the individual for all metro, bus and train travel across the region for a year.
You mention children having to have a zip card to ride free on the tube. Unless the rule has recently changed, it is only unaccompanied children who need a card. (If it has changed, that would be a problem for visitors, as the card is only available, I think, to London resident children).
Ah yes, sorry. On the tube, accompanied under 11s travel free, as do unaccompanied cardholders. But on National Rail, free travel is only available to under 11s with a card.
I rather suspect that PML, Bromley-b-B and East India *are* going to shift to be just Zone 2, but no one's thought to mention that. Otherwise... that'll be equally awkward to program and a stupid anomaly of the fare zones system. So I bet you my 10p increase that those three station will change come January 2016.

(And with my cynics hat on, the reason it didn't get mention, is because they deliberately didn't decide to mention it...)
"Free travel on National Rail services

Under 11s pay child rate fares on most National Rail services in London, but on some they can travel free."

https://tfl.gov.uk/fares-and-payments/travel-for-under-18s/travelling-with-children#on-this-page-2
Great news about the £1.50 avoiding Zone 1 freeze, though!
- timbo

It does happen on the Underground (try living at Preston Road) when thing go wrong, or trains get turned short so the ends of the line don't see any trains whizzing through or not. It's anyway not a simple matter; that non-stopping train might be so it can come back for people going the other way who've been waiting even longer than you.

- Geofftech

Not mentioned because it's not happening (and while the map will indeed look ugly nothing will be anomalous and it's a doddle to program).
There do seem to be rather a lot of zones in London as things stand at present..
Ralph,

ok! good to know. But in which case. West Ham to Bromleyy-by-Bow on the map is going to be a 'fun' design challenge for someone then, as I can't see how that would work using the current design rules for stations in both Zones.... interesting...
@ Ralph - so the three current Z23 boundary stations are NOT moving to Z2? What a mess - a zone boundary that will be aligned both E-W and N-S in a narrow geographical area. I can understand that it avoids a fare rise for those using those three stations and heading east (and those travelling from the east to those stops) but it's all a bit counter intuitive.
When I used to commute from Holborn in the evening (admittedly over ten years ago) there were regular times the Central Line skipped the station. Mainly because the station was 'too busy'. Which I always thought was odd because it meant the station just got busier.

But anyway, the point remains... when the tube or the train has problems, they make changes to the service. Underground has more options for curtailing services short than National Rail does, so they're more likely to skip stations.
@ Anon 0727 - there are no plans for London to gain additional locally controlled funding AFAIK. The Treasury aren't going to do that because it'd allow London to keep money that's current syphoned off elsewhere.

The TfL position about declining bus patronage (or slower growth than expected) has included :-

- increasing population
- increased development work
- more road works causing delay
- TfL's own schemes like Crossrail, Victoria tube stn and cycle superhighway schemes screwing the traffic.

There's no doubt that traffic problems force people off buses and on to other modes to try to keep journey times reasonable. Who wants to sit for 40 mins to get through Elephant and Castle or 25 minutes to crawl through New Oxford St. TfL's approach has been to introduce a vast number of temporary timetables often reducing frequencies marginally to give buses more time to travel along a route. Other routes have been curtailed short of their normal terminus - again to give more time for buses to cover the shortened route. A large number of extra buses have been added to other routes to try to maintain performance. The reality is that a lot of money is being spent to try to "stand still" in performance terms rather than spending money to deliver actual improvements.

Only in the last couple of months have glimmers of improvements, a lot to do with the advent of Crossrail, started to emerge. These include more frequent services, double decks in place of single deckers plus new routes or restructuring to create new links. Many of these are out to consultation at present. Some lower frequency routes in SW London are also planned to have their service levels doubled and Sunday services added.
Just to elaborate on my earlier, I have now done the sums:
to travel from a Zone 6 station to a Zone 1 station (e.g Epping to Oxford Circus) off peak costs £3.10) But if you start from Bexley or Purley (also Zone 6) it costs £5.20 - a 68% markup. That will become 71% in January.

And don't think that avoiding Zone 1 gets you off the hook - in fact it's even worse:
West Ruislip to Shepherds Bush (Zone 6 to Zone 2) off peak is £1.50. Purley to Shepherds Bush via Clapham Junction is £2.60 - a 73% markup, which will become 80% in January
London Reconnections (rarely wrong) have said:
"For completeness this change means Pudding Mill Lane, East India and Bromley by Bow stations entirely into Zone 2." (sic)
In a comment, subsequently made to the London Reconnections article, the author admits that it "looks as if he was wrong" [about the existing zone boundary stations), and apologises.

The safest assumption about these stations might be something along the lines of "don't know".
So much for "rarely wrong"!! :D
There would be a financial implication to moving a station from zone 2/3 to zone 2, specifically that journeys from outer London would cost more. The adjustment would be in TfL's favour, but I'd still be surprised if the rezoning was going ahead but the official Mayoral Decision had omitted to mention it.
There is precedent for lines and stations to be shown as being in a single zone on the map, but actually be across two zones, such as happens at Kew Gardens. The name has the box around it and straddles Zones 3/4, but the line and station blob is clearly some way in Zone 4.
Oyster Zip for under 11s are available wherever you live. If overseas you need to arrange in advance and collect from an visitor centre on arrival.

https://tfl.gov.uk/fares-and-payments/travel-for-under-18s/zip-oyster-photocards

Interesting complication due to the geography of the radial lines into Stratford.

I wonder if the stations in question will be moved to Zone 2, but the fares for Oyster/contactless users from outer London will remain to Zone 3? There are other inconspicuous fare easements in place, such as in the Shoreditch ELL and Notting Hill Gate areas, which benefit those making local journeys with PAYG.
- PC

Some of us have seen a whole area in 2 zones before, though the overlapping West End and City zones were probably in the Archbishop's time rather than yours. My then landlord of course complained bitterly that the overlap ended one stop short of his office, rather than being grateful that he only had to walk one stop to cut his fare rather than the 3 stops if there had been no overlap.
@ Ralph - flashback time there with certain references to people! I have the leaflets for "Just the Ticket" and "Fares Fair" changes back in the 80s so am well aware of the West End and City zone overlap. Of course that didn't last terribly long and not into the era of ticket gates in Zone 1. Obviously you can have stations in two zones and you can also have short distance fares for certain local trips. I just think it will look bizarre and may cause some confusion for people.

For those enjoying the "London Reconnections blog is wrong" aspect then I wrote that article and as I have said over there I made an assumption. DG didn't make the same assumption, others then commented here and that made me pause and then apologise. Those of us sitting outside TfL and just having to work from Mayoral Decision documents don't have perfect knowledge. Perhaps someone else would like to write the next Fares Revision article for LR to ensure 100% accuracy?? ;-)
It's a damned good London Reconnections Fares Revision article too.
http://www.londonreconnections.com/2015/the-2016-fare-announcement
@DG: you're not too far off the mark with your dual zone idea, I've seen the draft of the new map.










TridentScan | Privacy Policy