please empty your brain below |
I've always thought that the most fun with the Turbine Hall installations is to be had watching how others choose to 'interact' with the art.
I've spent countless hours people-watching in there over the years. Some of the art has been good too - this looks intriguing. |
Complete the following cliché:
"I don't know much about modern art, but...." My completion is: "but I wonder if future generations will look back at it with the same awe-struck reverence as we, today, look back at impressionism". |
Sounds like complete and utter crap, put on for pseuds and the gullible by a gallery that, essentially, has no decent modern art to show.
|
@David - I shared a similar viewpoint until I first visited Tate Modern a few years back. What I found was some art that was utterly meaningless (to me) but also some that was affecting, and thought provoking - and/or simply interesting. Not unlike the variety we find daily on this blog.
I don't regard myself as a pseud and I'm certainly not gullible. I think it's down to having an open mind, and a degree of maturity. Still.. each to their own. |
Am I the only one who preferred the Turbine Hall when it still had working turbines in it?
|
@Lemof London
No, you're not. (My uncle used to work there) Am I the only one unable to understand the difference between yesterday's post and today's? |
My brother was an apprentice engineer there. The turbine hall was hot and noisy. There's real art in a turbine.
|
Saw it on Friday evening. Boy, was it boring, and the most of the speech was impossible to make out. I wonder if that was deliberate. But it might perhaps explain why about a third of the audience were using their mobile phones, another third were chatting amongst themselves, and several more were lying down ignoring the screen entirely. Didn't notice any helium-filled floating fish, but the on-screen "squid" was a cuttlefish.
"Dull" is too generous. |
TridentScan Privacy Policy | |