please empty your brain below

The R68 squeezes in by one stop only; that at Hampton Court station itself. You probably get only 100m out of 'London' on this one!

And yet on one of these routes you never even leave the London postal district, despite the fact that most of outer London doesn't even have a London postal address. (Although I am pleased to see a gradual shift today, with digital databases identifying Greater London when an outer London postcode is typed)

I've never understood how Epsom and Ewell got away with staying in Surrey. The more southerly bits may well be proper Surreydom, but Epsom and Ewell themselves are certainly part of the main London conurbation.

You've missed those sneaky routes that only sneak into "beyond London" during the Summer like the 267 to Hampton Court on Sundays and the 215 to Lee Valley Campsite!

I once did a loop using the 405 from Croydon to Redhill then train to Dorking Deepdene and 465 back to Kingston. A very pleasant run out even if I was at risk of a missed connection at Redhill due to an unexpected traffic jam at Purley. As it was a Sunday service the prospect of an hour's wait at Dorking didn't appeal! I think Saturday frequencies are probably a safer bet.

"They don't pay London council tax ..."

I have a strong suspicion that in the case of Surrey anyway the county council subsidises the cross-border element. I cannot believe that TfL would run the 166 to all the way to Epsom Hospital every hour until early evening if they didn't. Similarly the 405 to Redhill would make little sense for TfL to run unsubsidised. When you get to Redhill Bus station there is nothing to indicate it is a TfL service. The stop is not a TfL one and the timetable is not in TfL format. It is treated in the same way as all the other local services. It just happens to be run by TfL and consequently accepts Oyster cards.



The 405 does have some funding from Surrey council - it's timetables say so, although it's predominantly a TfL service as you can tell by the London Buses bus stops and timetables along most of its route.

Of course in all this there is the flipside too - other areas services entering London. Harder to collate info I guess but Surrey Council run quite a few into Croydon and Kingston. I presume due to the lack of deregulation in London they have to be tendered services rather than commercial ones.

IIRC as well, timetables for non-TfL routes have a blue line at the top rather than red than the TfL ones have :)

&PC

The 267 summer Sunday extension terminates at Hampton Court Palace, not at the railway station across the river, so i doesn't leave Greater London.

The 465 has a long history, sdtarting as the 715 Green Lne.

Could do with a few more if you ask me. Oh for a TfL bus service that would link Stanmore and Bushey to Moor Park, Rickmansworth etc.

Details of all the non-TfL bus routes which operate in London (even if only for a short distance) can be found in the back of the London Service Permit Bulletin - see http://www.tfl.gov.uk/businessandpartners/busoperators/1228.aspx

It has been widely reported that there are plans to roll out Oyster further into Hertfordshire. It is therefore perfectly possible that, in the near future, 'touching in' will be able to take you deeper into the county. It would certainly be good to be able to use an Oyster card to go to St Albans, for example.

Indeed, it does appear that one may be able to use Oyster all the way up to Hertford East as of next year.

I'm always surprised when driving down the A24 to see the TfL roundels at bus stops at Box Hill and Dorking, but a look at the map shows that despite the rural landscape it's actually not geographically very far outside the boundary of Greater London.

Interestingly, Hampton Court rail station also lies just outside the boundary of London yet also can be reached using Oyster and Travelcards. Any chance of a companion post on how far you can get by train?

I don't really understand the amazement here, as many of these places (especially in the north) are within the London Travelcard Zone system with tube or rail, so for me it seems obvious that they are served by London buses as well.

Further to Andrew B's comment I am pretty sure the 402 is NOT a TfL service but like he says the London portion of it (from the boundary at Knockholt) is subsidised by TfL and within London only has TfL style timetables and bus stops and of course charges TfL fares. The 402 appears not to be covered by countdown/iBus.

Last time I used it, a few years ago, the driver's old ticket machine had no Oyster facility so from Sevenoaks I only had to pay as far as Knockholt.

I think Denham is in Bucks, not Herts.

I'm sure someone told me that some services in from Heathrow to Weybridge, 555 and the 556 take the Oyster card, even though they are not operated by TFL.

I'm sure someone told me that some services in from Heathrow to Weybridge, 555 and the 556 take the Oyster card, even though they are not operated by TFL.

Siwi

There ar several places, notably on the outer reaches of the Underground, where travlecards/Oyster are valid on trains but not local buses. The few buses outside the GLA area that accept Oyster are usually historical accidents. The trains are usually because of local political pressure and the attitude of the local operator to Oyster - note the difference between Caterham and Shepperton for example.

rail services outside the GLA area that accept Oyster/Travelcards:
Riddlesdown to Upper Warlingham
Kenley to Caterham
Reedham to Tattenham Corner
Belmont to Epsom Downs
Cheam to Ewell East
Worcester Park to Ewell West
Surbiton to Hampton Court
Northwood to Watford/Chesham/Amersham
Hatch End to Watford High Street
Mill Hill Bdy to Elsree & Borehamwood
Woodford to Epping/Hainault

(I have named each section as starting at the last station on the route that is within the GLA area, i.e. the GLA boundary is between that station and the next station away from London.
Both Woodford and Hainault are in the GLA area, but the intermediate stations between them are not (although two of them are right on the boundary).

Rational Plan

They don't take Oyster, but many Surrey-sponsored services (458,555) etc give a discounted fare to Travelcard holders within Greater London. Here is a list

http://www.notrog.plus.com/busroutes/businformation/greenacceptingpasses.htm

All these places used to be London Transport territory until the wrecking started.

@Timbo: On a pedantic note, Reedham is in the GLA area as is Coulsdon Town (even Coulsdon South is just inside) and Woodmansterne.

As I understand it, Essex subsidises, or at least used to subsidise, tube fares to keep Theydon Bois and Epping in zone 6. Not sure about the other central line stations in Essex.

And,

Over the last few years (since I've moved to the London/Surrey border) I have on occasions enquired as to why Epsom station is not in Zone 6: it is only 14 miles to London as tje crow flies (Zone 6 is from 12 to 18 miles - wikipedia).

It can often be quicker (and take one less train) to be routed south to Epsom (from Cheam Z5 /Ewell East Z6) to get to points north - and one is directed as such on TfL as well as national rail. Yet you can't use your travelcard.

The preponderous of buses here suggest that this is the biggest anomaly in London and I hope it can get sorted (a few years ago Surbiton campaigned to get into Zone 6 - and I know that distance is the key factor). But it is an important junction for radial travel - part of an outer circle.

DG

As a suggestion, you might like to look at how not late you have to leave London on a suburban line, e.g. the last train to Cheam, Ewell East leaves Vic at 11:26 (only), yet many many stations further out have departures up to and beyond midnight.

Another local curiosity which may be worthy of a post is a list of the worst bus destinations. Some single deckers on the 80 route now have the full name of the southbound destination boards prominently displayed. Older buses were more discreet. I just wouldn't feel good getting on this service...



Routes 402 & 477 ceased to accept Oyster cards and travelcards from 1 March 2010.

Ken

Epsom isn't in the Zones because SWT opearte it - they drag their heels on anything Oyster-related. Surbiton is in Greater London and has been in Z6 since it was created (by splitting Z5). The recent campaign was to put it, and Kingston, into Z5 which its distance from central London would suggest is appropriate.

Pedantic: Reedham is, as I said, the last station in Greater London on the Tattenham Corner Line.
I didn't mention Coulsdon South or Woodmansterne because, on those lines, you cannot go beyond the GLA boundary on a Travelcard.

@Timbo.

Sorry but you are wrong. Even on your rather peculiar argument that identifies the penultimate station your reasoning falls down because on that basis the last station would be Coulsdon Town.

@Steve Bird: Do you mean on the 477 route passengers can no longer pay a cash fare equivalent to the Oyster fare upon showing a valid Oyster card and only travelling within the part of the route DG mentions? Or did they properly take Oyster before last year?

DG: This is a topic close to my heart as my parents live between the B12 and 477 routes, just outside London - the 477's their nearest bus.

The B12 is Bexley borough's only six-days-a-week bus, so if my parents invite us round at the weekend, there's a 50% chance we can't do it by TfL bus alone. Bexley council's Public Transport Sub-Committee's been lobbying TfL to have a Sunday service for a few years, unsuccessfully thus far. TfL aren't prepared to fund it themselves alone, so have been negotiating with Kent County Council, who were prepared to commit enough funding for two years, but TfL need five to go ahead. At the cttee meeting in September, the TfL report seemed for the first time pessimistic about this ever happening now, sadly.

Meanwhile, I've never used the 477 because, to do the four-minute journey to their home from the nearest TfL bus to interchange with (233), Arriva charged a ludicrous £2.40 when I last enquired a couple of years ago. Furthermore, it has a decidedly unLondonlike timetable - poor frequencies, early stopping in evenings, etc. So we just get a lift instead. I wish the 477 were a TfL bus, particularly as both ends of its route are well served by TfL buses. But that's not even being talked about, let alone turned down for lack of funding.

If only we had some sort of mayoral election on the cards at which the candidates wanted the votes of outer Londoners, eh? After all, the people outside London who don't pay for TfL would benefit, sure, but so would those just inside London, who do, and would rather like to be able to travel in more than one-half of all possible directions!

I notice the link to the PDF list of buses is broken (The last copy I can find, thanks Google cache, was valid 'til 31st October 2009), anyone know how to check if a bus accepts Oyster (The Tfl/Oyster websites are not forthcoming)?

Specifically I'm interested in the 117, 203, 216 and 290 buses that head out to Staines.

Cheers
The 84 bus route is no longer anything to do with TfL, though the buses are still red. It's managed by Hertfordshire: Oyster / Travelcard / Contactless is not available on any part of the route (they used to be valid within Greater London). Cash fares / weekly tickets only.
The Harrow local paper has devoted many column inches recently to the possibility that Hertfordshire are seriously considering reducing the subsidy for the TfL buses that run through Harrow into their county (107,142,258 and 292).










TridentScan | Privacy Policy