please empty your brain below

Not quite a bottomless catalogue on streaming though. There's a lot of older content that's still only available on physical media. Indeed a huge number of films are not available with a subscription. Just try and find anything in black and white on Netflix!

Even with music, a lot of old b sides have never been made available.

Most people won't care but notably one of the early selling points of a digital catalogue was that it would make all archive stuff easier to get as the cost to market would be lower. The reality is the exact opposite
One thing that often intrigues me is how the digital contents shall be dealt with after one's death.
If one's family have the right to claim his or her account and all the contents, how awkward it would be if there're very "private" things in there, which couldn't have been so easily kept secret with books and DVDs.
I'm keeping hold of my vinyl as there are plenty of times I've gone to look to play something on Spotify from the comfort of my armchair to find that it isn't on there. Or that the pesky Sonos has crashed again and the music has stopped. No such problem with a non-internet reliant turntable!

Something tangible about a CD or LP to hold and peruse about perhaps the artwork or lyrics or who played on what and with.
Very true on the films, Andrew. I have friends who regard me as some sort of luddite just because I still subscribe to a DVD/Bluray rental service. But I like like classics and foreign stuff, and the majority isn't available online. I still have a Netflix and Prime account, of course...
Charity shops are always a good way of seeing how technology is going. Most now refuse VHS tapes but I've picked up some cracking art house movies at 25p a pop recently. They're certainly not on Netflix/Sky Cinema.

Now I notice it's DVD's that are going. 3 for a pound in one shop.

As for vinyl. Now they're charging silly money for it...
"Yes I know that you, archetypal DG reader, still play CDs and watch DVDs, but the world around you has very much moved on."

Hah, you know your audience :D
"Books haven't entirely followed the trend, because e-readers don't quite match the paper experience"

I suspect the success of video streaming as compared to ebooks is also to do with the fact, for video, one or two relatively modestly priced subscriptions give you access to an enormous library.

This doesn't apply to ebooks where there is no service with the sufficient breadth or depth and at the right price point.

I can rent (or buy) the latest blockbuster for £3-4 or it might even be included in a £7-8 subscription- the DVD back in the day would cost at least a tenner.

An ebook is typically the same or similar cost to its physical equivalent, so the only advantage is the convenience factor. Ebooks have therefore remained something for holidaymakers saving suitcase space or infrequent readers who don't necessarily value collecting/owning books.
Oh how true this prediction was!

I still stand by my 2010 comment that now I have VHS and DVDs of my children in the 1990s 2000s, but nothing now to play them on!
All my photos are on the computer.I used to make photo albums but the last one I completed was in 2007.

A major move in 2012 saw the charity shops receiving all our physical media save a few favourite books, so yes, looking at my bookcase, there are probably fewer than 50 books on it now - not because e-books have taken over, but because thankfully there are still libraries around!
I'm very sceptical about this narrative of digital being more easily lost. It's easy to delete digital files, but just as easy to copy them; how many people have several copies of their conventional photo album lying around their house, another copy at their parents', and another that they carry around in their pocket at all times? Yet that's pretty common with digital photos.
I have always been in favour of 'solid' media to keep, but some things have changed out of necessity.

MUSIC has seen the biggest change for me. On the downside, a lot of what I would buy on CD is either no longer available or outrageously expensive, especially if bought from abroad with the high p&p charges.
On the plus side, there is a much wider choice to buy online and download that is usually very reasonable / cheap / free, and my digital collection from Bandcamp alone is showing at 818 (mostly made up of cheap artist collections). The other advantage is that the online world gives access to such a variety of talented artists and music that I like that I would never have found otherwise.

The downside of buying music in this way is that, unlike a CD, the downloads have no monetary value because they are not solid media I’ve bought that can be sold on.

DVDs. I will still buy these, and also buy Blu-Ray if I think that it is worth paying more for better quality video and sound (not all BR are good quality!).
Unless it’s something I really want on release, I’ll usually buy from pound shops or used from Amazon etc.I don’t buy digital downloads because I assume that they are DR protected and limit my use of them.

I like the flexibility to watch what I want on what device. Music and videos are stored on a NAS and thus I have instant access without having to mess about with discs and boxes.

BOOKs. I’ve always liked a physical book or manual, it’s so much easier to read. Paperbacks (generally bought from charity shops) are kept, together with some books that I may use for reference etc. But because so much stuff is available online now, I find that I rarely buy anything other than paperbacks (saves a lot of space as well!)
Oh, I love the feel of a good book. But, unfortunately, I simply don't have *room* for more of the buggers! So my Kindle is loaded with all sorts.










TridentScan | Privacy Policy